Keck-presentation

From Earlham Cluster Department

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 52: Line 52:
*Closing
*Closing
-
= III) Why Project (Ron 10 min) =
+
= III) Why Project (Ron 15 min) =
 +
* Goals and Objectives
 +
* All that other stuff
= IV) What Project (50 min total) =
= IV) What Project (50 min total) =
-
* Goals and Objectives Mike (5 min), or as part of Why Project
+
== Courses (Mike 5 min) ==
-
* Courses (Mike 5 min)
+
== Intro: Gen Chem (Mike 10 min) ==
-
** Intro: Gen Chem (Mike 10 min)
+
== Upper: Geology (Ron 10 min) ==
-
** Upper: Geology (Ron 10 min)
+
* Break
* Break
-
* Research: Biology (David 10 min)
+
== Research: Biology (David 10 min) ==
-
* Seminars (Meg 5 min)
+
== Seminars (Meg 5 min) ==
-
* Dissemination/Evaluation (Lori 5 min)
+
== Dissemination/Evaluation (Lori 5 min) ==
Dissemination activities will include:
Dissemination activities will include:

Revision as of 19:51, 24 September 2006

Contents

I) Who we are (Mike 5 min)

II) Why Earlham (Charlie 15 min)

III) Why Project (Ron 15 min)

IV) What Project (50 min total)

Courses (Mike 5 min)

Intro: Gen Chem (Mike 10 min)

Upper: Geology (Ron 10 min)

Research: Biology (David 10 min)

Seminars (Meg 5 min)

Dissemination/Evaluation (Lori 5 min)

Dissemination activities will include:

• NITLE workshop on integrating multi-disciplinary computational methods into the undergraduate science curriculum. We have already arranged with the National Institute for Technology and Liberal Education (NITLE) to offer a workshop for our peers where we will describe what we have done and offer suggestions for how similar programs can be implemented at their institutions.

• Earlham Science Poster Session (held each Fall)

• Student presentation of papers at regional and national scientific conferences (Butler Undergraduate Research Conference, Geological Society of America, American Chemical Society, etc).

• CUR publications and programs

• Student/Faculty papers in science pedagogy journals and basic science journals, as appropriate.

Evaluation will include:

• External evaluation both during and at the conclusion of the grant period

• Qualitative evaluation: open-ended surveys, interviews

• Quantitative evaluation: quantitative surveys, pre and post grant levels of undergraduate research, curricular use of computational modeling and interdisciplinary projects

V) Why Keck (Lori 5 min)

Why Keck:

• Long tradition of supporting curricular innovation: Funding for undergraduate research at small liberal arts colleges is limited. The W.M. Keck Foundation is known and respected throughout the scientific community as a foundation that supports innovative science programs at high-quality libral arts institutions.

• Limited sources of support for such a comprehensive multidisciplinary program: Most sources support only limited interdisciplinary work (bio and chem., for example) and most do not support such work at undergraduate institutions


• NSF funding for science education at 4yr institutions has been flat for past 10 years and curricular improvements funding has decreased by 50% over same timeframe


• Strong supporter of computational science education: the Keck Undergraduate Computational Science Education Consortium headed by Capital University.

• Keck support would also raise the visibility of the sciences regionally and nationally.

Wrap-up: Review, questions, tour next (Mike 5 min)

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
websites
wiki
this semester
Toolbox