England-2011-mckayla

From Earlham Cluster Department

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(McKayla's Journal)
(Atmosphere I)
Line 14: Line 14:
''Which specific aspects of climate change did the designers of atmosphere choose to focus on?''
''Which specific aspects of climate change did the designers of atmosphere choose to focus on?''
 +
Today, climate change is synonymous with global warming. If scientists talk about solutions to climate change, they are talking about ways to reduce the rate at which the planet is warming. There are other types of climate change and this is different than weather; weather is unpredictable and varies daily while climate is used to describe the measure of the climate system over a large period of time. A colder winter is therefore possible when world temperatures collectively rise. Climate change can also describe trends in global cooling. The majority of the Atmosphere Exhibit at the Science Museum focused exclusively on aspects of global warming.
''How well sourced was the science and technology discussed in the kiosks?''
''How well sourced was the science and technology discussed in the kiosks?''

Revision as of 21:35, 5 February 2011

McKayla's Journal

The Future of Science and Technology for Society

In your view what are the three most important challenges facing society in the near term (say 50 years)? Why are each of these so important? What does science have to offer for each? What does technology have to offer for each? Your entry should clearly address which are science based and which are technology based. You can describe both science and technology approaches for each of the problems you identify.

It goes without saying that the next fifty years will encompass a plethora of new advances in science and applications in technology. The three most important challenges facing society in the near term will be ones that prevent instabilities. To be more specific, it is in the interests of the prevailing systems of power to finance and encourage researchers to come up with solutions to problems that have the potential to generate civil war and political unrest. The three most important challenges will be concentrated on manipulating the natural world to relieve or eliminate the dependence of all nations on oil, to create ways to make and bring fresh water to all portions of the world population, and to create more efficient, safer methods of mass transportation.

The first challenge is important because governments are investing a lot of money and risking countless lives in wars whose central importance is to have access to the oil that is used to create the majority of electrical power in their respective countries. Lives will be saved because those individuals will not be sent into a war. Human rights will be upheld because tyrannical dictators will not be installed who have agreements with the US to not jeopardize the US’s access to oil. Furthermore, turning from a non-renewable resource and investing in the technology to draw energy from a renewable resource will sustain itself. For this problem, science is concerned with researching the creation of energy, focusing on the reactions of atoms they had not studied with that prerogative in mind. Technology uses the discoveries of science to create efficient, low-cost machines that harvest the new forms of energy scientists have studied and proposed engineers should and could harvest.

The second challenge is important because of the real fear of water wars. With growing populations, hoarding of fresh water by countries, and the problem of distribution, water wars could turn desperate people into perpetrators and victims of widespread violence. Science could investigate the natural process to desalinize water present in the water cycle and research how desert plants gain and store water. Technology could use the information uncovered from science to come up with machines to cheaply and efficiently extract the salt from sea water and therefore make more drinkable water available in general and in places where it usually is not available. As well, technology could improve and create new ways to transport fresh water. They would use the laws of the natural universe - such as gravity, physics, and thermodynamics - to do so.

The third challenge is important because public transportation is not being used efficiently and cities, specifically in the US, are not laid out in an efficient nor compact manner to make them accessible to everyone regardless of income. Science could discover new ways to get energy from alternative sources or gain more information on the current system to more efficiently continue to use it. Science could examine the migration patterns of animals, specifically ants and birds, to question whether their systems of movement work to organize masses of people efficiently. Scientists could also investigate where most people go on a regular basis and traffic patterns to give the information to technology makers. Technology could then come up with viable routes and use enough vehicles to transport the correct amount of people. Technology could also refine transport to accommodate the change from oil energy to alternative energy

Atmosphere I

Which specific aspects of climate change did the designers of atmosphere choose to focus on? Today, climate change is synonymous with global warming. If scientists talk about solutions to climate change, they are talking about ways to reduce the rate at which the planet is warming. There are other types of climate change and this is different than weather; weather is unpredictable and varies daily while climate is used to describe the measure of the climate system over a large period of time. A colder winter is therefore possible when world temperatures collectively rise. Climate change can also describe trends in global cooling. The majority of the Atmosphere Exhibit at the Science Museum focused exclusively on aspects of global warming.

How well sourced was the science and technology discussed in the kiosks?

What was the most surprising thing you learned?

Which of the interactive kiosks did you find most engaging? Why?

Which of the interactive kiosks did you find least engaging? Why?

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
websites
wiki
this semester
Toolbox