CS382:Fire

From Earlham Cluster Department

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(General Education Alignment)
Line 31: Line 31:
*** One cell's state may or may not affect its neighbors
*** One cell's state may or may not affect its neighbors
*** Changes based on a set of rules
*** Changes based on a set of rules
-
** Agent Modeling - <font color="blue">Like we talked about in class, this may be too heavy for them before they actually see these, but if you show the models and then only give a few sentences about it, and ask the differences they saw rather than telling them about each type of modeling, it may go over better.</font>
+
** Agent Modeling  
*** Independent agents whose behavior is governed by sets of rules
*** Independent agents whose behavior is governed by sets of rules
** Systems Dynamics
** Systems Dynamics
Line 237: Line 237:
* <font color="blue">I think there's also a lot to be said that the entire lab is based on tweaking parameters and so seeing what happens with different experiments.</font>
* <font color="blue">I think there's also a lot to be said that the entire lab is based on tweaking parameters and so seeing what happens with different experiments.</font>
** That is in fact the gist behind the question I pose in the Inquiry Based Learning section.
** That is in fact the gist behind the question I pose in the Inquiry Based Learning section.
 +
* <font color="blue">Like we talked about in class, this may be too heavy for them before they actually see these, but if you show the models and then only give a few sentences about it, and ask the differences they saw rather than telling them about each type of modeling, it may go over better.</font>
 +
** That'll be the plan. We'll cover agent modeling ''very'' quickly, i.e. show that it's one other modeling type and fire can be done with it and move on.
= Authorship =  
= Authorship =  
* Fitz
* Fitz
* Vlado
* Vlado

Revision as of 14:18, 6 April 2009

Return to Insilico - Discrete Modeling Development

Contents

Fire

Overview

This short unit about the spreading of forest fires is intended to teach some of the basics of using a simple pre-made model/simulation. While there are many benefits to using this model, the ability to physically verify the results proves to be difficult. It turns out that the rudimentary simulation of a wild fire spreading through a forest of varying densities can be implemented in a wide range of tools including NetLogo, AgentSheets, Vensim, Excel, and possibly others. Thus, this single model can teach the basics of simulation techniques like agent modeling, cellular automata, and systems dynamics without requiring students to relearn or rediscover what results to expect and allows them to focus on the methods and the techniques.

Background Reading for Teachers and TAs

WildFire Modeling (wikipedia)

Agent-based modeling and simulation of wildland fire suppression

Reading Assignments for Students

Cellular Automata (wikipedia)

History of Cellular Automata

Reference Material

Lecture Notes

Lecture 1

Lecture 2

Lab

Nice work!

This lab will consist of learning how to use NetLogo's wildfire model to see how minor changes in parameters can, under certain circumstances, producing wildly different results.

The structure of this lab is loosely based on this.

Data should be recorded in a spreadsheet for easy graphing.

Process

  1. Open up NetLogo. Go to the model library and under the Earth Science category, open "Fire".
  2. Experiment with different values for the density.
    1. Try 1%, then 99%. Record the results for each of these. Percent burnout is the result. Where are the results output in Netlogo?
    2. Take a guess at what will happen at 60%, then try it. Record your result.
    3. How close was your guess? How close was your lab partner's?
  3. Start taking some more data:
    1. Record the percent burned at 50%, 60%, 70%.
  4. Graph your data.
  5. What does the graph look like?
    1. Possibilities: logarithmic, linear, exponential We will provide simple graph examples. Will you have covered these earlier, or will you provide examples of each of these so they know what to look for?
  6. What might you be able to conclude from this?
  7. Run it 10 times at {50,60,70}% and record the average for each set.
  8. Now graph the averages
  9. Does it look different?
    1. Will probably be closer to linear.
  10. What new conclusions can you make, if any?
  11. Record results for burning at {50,55,60,65,70}% and graph it when you have all of them.
    1. How did that change your graph?
  12. Again, do this 10 times for {50,55,60,65,70}%, average each, and graph them.
    1. How did that change your graph?

For the teachers and TAs, could you provide examples of what these should look like?

Write-up

Software

Bill of Materials

As long as the students don't try to actually burn down a forest to validate these models, there is no cost for this lab.

Evaluation

CRS Questions

  1. A technique called "systematic dynamical conflagration"
  2. Going out back campus and ....
  3. Coding the all properties of trees into a computer program
  4. A technique called "cellular automata"
  1. Automated Telecomune
  2. Tessellation Automata
  3. Biological Automated Simulation
  4. Systems Dynamics
  1. Stephen Wolfram
  2. John von Neumann
  3. Alan Turing
  4. Stanislaw Ulam

[][]-Added by Vlado (too many of them or if the 'NEED to Be better' comment is addressed - some of them replaced?)

  1. ground slope/shape
  2. wind & wind changes
  3. day/night cycle
  4. high air humidity
  1. 128
  2. 256
  3. 512
  4. 1024
  1. Wind
  2. Ground Slope
  3. Dry Wigs
  4. Large logs

Quiz Questions

Fire's Metadata

Scheduling

This should be very early in the semester as it is a fairly simple and short topic. Given its simplicity, it should only be a single week.

Concepts and Techniques

This unit should teach the basics of using someone else's model, as well the importance of conducting multiple runs with different parameters in order to gain an accurate understanding of the effect of the model. The WildFire model used in this unit provides a brief introduction to the concepts of VVA (Verification/Validation/Accreditation). Specifically, a rough notion of how a WildFire spreads can be obtained using this model, but it should be stressed that this model is nowhere near accurate when compared to one would actually happen.

General Education Alignment

Analytical Reasoning Requirement

Abstract Reasoning

From the [Catalog Description] Courses qualifying for credit in Abstract Reasoning typically share these characteristics:

Quantitative Reasoning

From the [Catalog Description] General Education courses in Quantitative Reasoning foster students' abilities to generate, interpret and evaluate quantitative information. In particular, Quantitative Reasoning courses help students develop abilities in such areas as:

Scientific Inquiry Requirement

From the [Catalog Description] Scientific inquiry:

Scaffolded Learning

The NetLogo model(s) in question are easy to use and easy to witness the effect of changing parameters to obtain different results. As well there are fairly clear extensions for the student inclined towards taking those steps.

Inquiry Based Learning

This unit should be able to pique the curiosity of the student, most likely in the form of the question: "Why is that that a single variable can have such a dramatic effect on the output of a system?"

Fire's Mechanics

To Do

Lab Feedback


Comments

Authorship

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
websites
wiki
this semester
Toolbox